ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Motion in support of advice letter of the WG on Consumer Metrics


I will second it.
Best regards,
Osvaldo

Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 05/12/2012, a las 21:18, 
"john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> escribió:



All,

For your consideration, below is a motion in support of the work of the
WG on Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice and Competition.  I am asking it
be put on our agenda for our December 20, 2012 meeting.

Note that the first time it was offered (then withdrawn for further
work), it was seconded by Carlos.  This motion needs a new second.  Let
me know who had such an urge.

Cheers,

Berard
____________________________________________

Motion on the Adoption of a Working Group on Consumer Trust, Consumer
Choice, and Competition (CTCCC)

Made by: John Berard

Seconded by: TBD

Whereas, on 10 December 2010, the ICANN Board adopted Resolution 30
(http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm) requesting
advice from the GNSO, ccNSO, ALAC and GAC on establishing the
definition, measures, and three-year targets for those measures, for
competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the
domain name system (DNS), such advice to be provided for discussion at
the ICANN International Public meeting in San Francisco from 13-18 March
2011;

Whereas, the GNSO Council approved the Charter
(http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf) for a Consumer
Choice, Trust, and Competition Working Group (CTCCCWG) to produce an
Advice Letter for consideration by Supporting Organizations(SOs) and
Advisory Committees (ACs) to assist them in responding to the Board
request for establishing the definition, measures, and three-year
targets for those measures, for competition, consumer trust and consumer
choice in the context of the domain name system;

Whereas, the CCI WG created a draft Advice Letter and posted it for
Public Comment
(http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/cctc-draft-advice-letter-23feb12-en.htm);


Whereas, the CCI WG reviewed all Public Comments and feedback from
public sessions and produced a Final Advice Letter
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/cctc/cctc-final-advice-letter-05dec12-en.pdf
) for consideration by the SOs and ACs.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, the GNSO Council endorses there commendations for establishing
the definition, measures and three-year targets for those measures for
competition, consumer trust and consumer choice in the context of the
domain name system as described in the Final Advice Letter.

RESOLVED FURTHER, the GNSO Council approves the delivery of the Final
Advice Letter to the ICANN Board.

RESOLVED FURTHER, the GNSO Council thanks the CTCCC WG members for their
diligence and persistent efforts on this important topic and disbands
the Working Group.


________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente 
al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. 
Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente 
respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los 
posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier 
utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad 
que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna 
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida 
incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información


This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the 
addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender 
immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. 
Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not 
the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any 
communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>