ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: URS update

  • To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: URS update
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:28:26 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <003901cdc89e$2fc610f0$8f5232d0$@ipracon.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C4B5E5D7461AB54B875986D2919CBB5FD1FD84C0C3@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <003901cdc89e$2fc610f0$8f5232d0$@ipracon.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So, when can we expect ”the further updates” from Olof?
/ Petter
Petter Rindforth, LL M
Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read,
copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please
delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <http://www.fenixlegal.eu/>
Thank you
On 22 nov 2012 11:43 "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> All,
> Please see below with an update on the URS from Olof.
> Jonathan
> From:Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 November 2012 10:26
> To: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: URS update
> Dear Jonathan,
> The deadline for responses to the URS RFI has passed and I’m happy to
> inform you that we have received several responses which we are now
> evaluating. Moreover, my first impression is that the situation looks
> quite promising, both in terms of adherence to the URS text and
> regarding the target fee. This also means that there is less of an
> urgency than I previously thought  to convene a drafting team (and I’m
> glad to have been proven wrong in that regard!). There may still be
> details where such a drafting team can provide useful guidance and I
> will get back to you with further updates on this and other URS
> matters as we advance with the evaluations.
> Very best regards
> Olof

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>