ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart
  • From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:51:27 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac22xy4iy/bnLo4oSkS3qR67afmehg==
  • Thread-topic: Final GNSO WHOIS RT Summary Chart

Dear All,

Please find attached final summary chart, clean and redlined, to reflect all of 
the input received to date.  Please note that the chart is missing any input 
from Registrars or the NCSG regarding whether they agree/disagree with each of 
the WHOIS RT recommendations.

All the best,

Margie
_________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_________

From: Margie Milam
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 1:58 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations- REMINDER FOR FINAL 
COMMENTS

Dear All,

I just wanted to send a reminder on this, since I have only received comments 
from the IPC.

Please let me know by COB today whether your SG/C has any additional comments 
to the chart.

All the best,
Margie

From: Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:05 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Updated WHOIS RT FInal Report Recommendations

Dear All,

As discussed last week,  I updated the draft WHOIS RT summary chart to include 
the clarifications requested by the ISP Constituency, and to include a column 
clarifying whether there was agreement with the substance of each 
recommendation, based upon the comments submitted in the Public Comment Forum 
(PCF) for the WHOIS Review Team Final Report.

In reviewing the 
comments<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/report-comments-whois-rt-final-report-11jul12-en.pdf>
 filed in the PCF, I did not locate submissions from each constituency/SG, 
making it difficult to complete the chart.   Notably missing were comments from 
Registrars, NCSG, or the IPC on the Final Report (although in some cases there 
were submissions on the draft report).   In addition, from the comments 
actually submitted,  it was not clear whether the commentators agreed/disagreed 
with the recommendation itself, since many of the comments appeared to address 
aspects of the recommendations, as opposed to evaluating the recommendation 
holistically.

As a result,  it is important that each constituency/stakeholder group review 
the information contained in the attached chart, and indicate whether they 
agree/disagree with each of the recommendations.

Please provide this information by COB Monday, October 29, 2012, so that the 
chart can be finalized in advance of the Board's consideration of the WHOIS RT 
Final Report Recommendations.

All the best,

Margie

_______

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______


Attachment: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto clean (4934260) (3).doc
Description: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto clean (4934260) (3).doc

Attachment: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto v6 (4934260) (3).doc
Description: WHOIS Review Team Final GC Recommendations - Toronto v6 (4934260) (3).doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>