<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:50:21 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac22pX4fUZp1OVZ1TQaW+haKrnBYzQ==
- Thread-topic: Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures
https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/asep-recommendations-26oct12-en.htm
Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures
Comment/Reply Periods (*)
Important Information Links
Comment Open:
26 October 2012
Comment Close:
16 November 2012
Close Time (UTC):
23:59 UTC
Public Comment
Announcement<https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-26oct12-en.htm>
Reply Open:
17 November 2012
To Submit Your Comments (Forum)<mailto:asep-recommendations@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply Close:
8 December 2012
View Comments Submitted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/asep-recommendations/>
Close Time (UTC):
23:59 UTC
Report of Public Comments
Brief Overview
Originating Organization:
ICANN Board
Categories/Tags:
Transparency/Accountability
Purpose (Brief):
To receive comments on the recommended enhancements to ICANN's Reconsideration
Process and Independent Review Process provided by the Accountability
Structures Expert Panel (ASEP). The ASEP, that was formed in fulfillment of the
Accountability and Transparency Review Team Recommendations 23 and 25,
developed these recommendations after a series of work sessions and discussions
at ICANN's public meeting in Toronto. ICANN is also providing draft Bylaws
revisions that would give effect to the ASEP's recommendations.
Current Status:
The ASEP Recommendations and corresponding proposed Bylaws revisions are ready
for community consideration and input.
Next Steps:
The community input will be provided to the ASEP to consider if refinement is
needed. The ASEP's recommendations and the community input will be provided to
the Board for consideration.
Staff Contact:
Samantha Eisner, Senior Counsel
Email:
Samantha.Eisner@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:samantha.eisner@xxxxxxxxx?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Expert%20Recommended%20Improvements%20to%20ICANN%27s%20Accountability%20Structures%20public%20comment%20period>
Detailed Information
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose
Recommendations 23 and 25 of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team
called for ICANN to convene a group of experts to review ICANN's accountability
structures, including the Reconsideration Process and the Independent Review
Process. In response, ICANN convened the Accountability Structures Expert Panel
(ASEP). The ASEP is comprised of three international experts in the fields of
corporate governance, accountability, judicial review and international dispute
resolution.
The ASEP has produced a report containing recommended enhancements and
refinements to ICANN's Reconsideration Process and Independent Review Panel,
with a focus on effectiveness, efficiency, ease of access and expeditious
resolution, as well as maintaining and enhancing ICANN's accountability to the
community and the global public interest. Prior to issuing the report, the ASEP
has maintained an open comment period and interacted with the community at
ICANN's public meeting in Toronto.
In the event that the ASEP's recommendations are accepted by the Board, the
ICANN Bylaws will have to be amended to give effect to the recommendations. To
that end, proposed Bylaws amendments are also provide for community review and
comment.
Section II: Background
ICANN's Reconsideration and Independent Review Processes have been in place for
a number of years. Information on the current Reconsideration Process is
available at
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/governance/reconsideration<https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/governance/reconsideration>,
and documentation of the two Independent Review Processes to date is available
at http://www.icann.org/en/news/irp<https://www.icann.org/en/news/irp>.
Section III: Document and Resource Links
ICANN is seeking comment on the following documents:
* ASEP
Report<https://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/asep/report-26oct12-en.pdf>
[PDF, 1.39 MB];
* Proposed Bylaws Revisions for the Reconsideration
Process<https://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/proposed-bylaw-revision-reconsideration-26oct12-en.pdf>
[PDF, 113 KB]; and
* Proposed Bylaws Revisions for the Independent Review
Process<https://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/proposed-bylaw-revision-irp-26oct12-en.pdf>
[PDF, 93 KB] and corresponding Cooperative Engagement Process for Independent
Review<https://www.icann.org/en/news/irp/proposed-cep-26oct12-en.pdf> [PDF, 36
KB].
Section IV: Additional Information
None
(*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to
be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making
that takes place once this period lapses.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|