RE: [council] FW: URS follow-up

[Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jonathan and GNSO Council,

Please allow me to extend my apologies for needing to leave Toronto on 
Wednesday evening.  As I had mentioned to a few of you, I was accepted to a 
highly competitive institute which certifies women to serve on public company 
boards and the program took place in NYC on Thursday and Friday of last week. I 
was disappointed to leave prior to the new council being seated and I am most 
looking forward to working with all of you.

Jonathan, I would be happy to assist with URS as well and look forward to 
getting involved in other new initiatives.

With my kindest regards,

Jennifer

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
managing director, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy ADVISORY firm
managing partner, Wolfe, Sadler, Breen, Morasch & Colby, a law firm serving 
global clients
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011 & 2012
Follow Me: [Description: Description: Description: 
http://uploads.wisestamp.com/ec06f2504a47651994c1ba4a137d9802/1343326609.png] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>  [Description: Description: Description: 
http://uploads.wisestamp.com/ec06f2504a47651994c1ba4a137d9802/1343326620.png] 
<http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>  [Description: Description: Description: 
http://uploads.wisestamp.com/ec06f2504a47651994c1ba4a137d9802/1343326632.png] 
<https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
Blog: Moneyball changed baseball – will gTLDs change the internet?

4430 Carver Woods Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45242
513 746 2801 direct line | 513 746 2828 fax
Privileged/confidential information may be contained in this message. If you 
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of 
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to 
anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the 
sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not 
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and 
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business 
of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Petter Rindforth
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:38 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Robinson
Subject: Re: [council] FW: URS follow-up

Dear Jonathan and All new Colleagues,

Just to express my interest in participate in the further work with URS (as it 
seems we now have to).

I have experience as an .xxx Arbitrator and also created the Swedish ADR 
Accelerated Proceeding, so I hope I can therewith add some ideas  - and 
questions  - in order to have a fast as possible final solution regarding the 
URS.

Best,
Petter


--

Petter Rindforth, LL M



Fenix Legal KB

Stureplan 4c, 4tr

114 35 Stockholm

Sweden

Fax: +46(0)8-4631010

Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360

E-mail: petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>





NOTICE

This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to 
whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged 
information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any 
of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by 
return e-mail.

Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu<http://www.fenixlegal.eu>

Thank you

On 21 okt 2012 23:44 "Jonathan Robinson" 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,

Please be aware of the following note from Olof Nordling when we next consider 
the URS and associated issues.

Jonathan

From: Olof Nordling 
[mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx]>
Sent: 21 October 2012 15:33
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kurt Pritz
Subject: URS follow-up

Dear Jonathan,
Congratulations to your recent election as GNSO Council Chair and many thanks 
to you and to all Council members for the constructive discussions we had on 
URS matters on 18 October! The willingness to consider a drafting team to 
address URS implementation questions and issues is much appreciated.

The subsequent URS session the same day in Toronto proved most interesting. In 
addition to presentations from NAF and WIPO as  potential URS providers, we had 
the advantage of a very late addition to the agenda – a presentation from a 
“new entrant”, Intersponsive, intending to respond to the RFI with a proposal 
within the target fee, although with some adjustments of the URS provisions. 
Also NAF clarified that they would be able to stay within the target fee, 
provided reasonable limitations could be established to the current translation 
requirements and to the number of domain names covered by a single complaint.

I realize that you and other Council members couldn’t attend this session, as 
it partially overlapped with the GNSO Council session, but the recording is 
available at http://audio.icann.org/meetings/toronto2012/urs-18oct12-en.mp3. 
Furthermore, there are a number of relevant documents posted on our recently 
established URS web page at http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs, 
notably contributions from NAF, WIPO and CAC, with considerations, proposals, 
some costing aspects and, most importantly, questions needing to be resolved 
(the NAF contribution is of particular interest in that regard).

I believe these recent developments further clarifies the need for a drafting 
team to establish realistic implementation measures based on the URS text. I 
look forward to further contacts with you and the Council on this matter in the 
near future.

Very best regards
Olof