<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
- To: "'Wendy Seltzer'" <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
- From: "Winterfeldt, Brian" <bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:26:15 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4FF6BF26.20300@seltzer.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CA576872-E416-42F3-8789-B073D21BEF92@indom.com> <4FF6BF26.20300@seltzer.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac1bY2RsqyoD47yJTmK2mc1nl+IYsgAH958Q
- Thread-topic: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
I am happy to join Wendy as apart of the small group as well.
Best,
Brian
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Partner
bwinterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Steptoe
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 6:34 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
On 07/01/2012 07:00 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> GNSO Review
> We have discussed two possible alternatives: drafting a request to the SIC to
> delay the review and creating a small group to look at this issue. What do we
> want to do?
I volunteer to be part of a small group discussing the review. I favor
*advancing* rather than delaying the review, as well as helping the SIC to
frame it to address the challenges and barriers to consensus-building that stem
from our current siloed structure.
--Wendy
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613 Fellow, Yale Law School
Information Society Project Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
Harvard University http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|