<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Action items from Prague / GNSO Review
- From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 06:34:14 -0400
- Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CA576872-E416-42F3-8789-B073D21BEF92@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CA576872-E416-42F3-8789-B073D21BEF92@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 07/01/2012 07:00 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> GNSO Review
> We have discussed two possible alternatives: drafting a request to the SIC to
> delay the review and creating a small group to look at this issue. What do we
> want to do?
I volunteer to be part of a small group discussing the review. I favor
*advancing* rather than delaying the review, as well as helping the SIC
to frame it to address the challenges and barriers to consensus-building
that stem from our current siloed structure.
--Wendy
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613
Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|