<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [council] Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public Board Meetings
My personal view on this is mixed.
Saving of time and money is always preferable - but not at the expense of
transparency when the board is taking decisions at public meetings. SO/AC/BC
reporting could be removed by providing them in written form only.
But it makes a difference
- to hold "a one-hour session following the Public Forum on Thursday
afternoon..... and outline what they have heard during the week from their
meetings with AC/SOs and their constituent parts and identify those matters
they expect to be dealing with...", to decide upon during non-public board
sessions and at the following ICANN Public Meeting to "report to the community
on what they have dealt with since Prague"
or
- to discuss and take decisions publicly
I'm curious to know whether this board decision was based on the survey
("Improving Global Engagement") ICANN started in March where they solicited
community input on improving e.g. effectiveness. For me the Public Meetings -
with all their facets - are per se the highlights of global engagement.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012 22:52
An: Margie Milam
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council
Betreff: Re: [council] Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public
Board Meetings
Thanks Margie, much appreciated.
In the meantime, let me add some more context for the benefit of the Council.
In CR, Steve asked me what I would think of the idea of shortening the ICANN
meeting week by doing away with the Friday. This was floated to me as just an
idea. I was given no indication that it would be implemented one day, let alone
in Prague. And I was given no details on its possible implementation.
When Steve discussed this with me, I did not get the sense that he meant to do
a public consultation on this decision. This was a private conversation and not
one where it was at any time made clear to me that I should break Steve's
confidence and discuss this publicly. That is why I did not discuss this here.
This week's announcement has, as Jeff says, generated some negative comments.
Those that I have seen are that this decision was taken without any
consultation and that doing away with the Friday Board meeting is detrimental
to transparency.
My own personal view is otherwise. I believe that cutting the Friday out of the
ICANN week is a step in the right direction towards reducing costs and time
challenges for meeting participants, including the Board. Over the past year, I
have seen the Board work hard to improve its transparency. We now have detailed
rationale on votes at every meeting and explanations of the issues being
considered. So I am comfortable with giving the Board a little of the benefit
of the doubt in trying out new ideas such as this one.
Stéphane
Le 2 mai 2012 à 22:10, Margie Milam a écrit :
Hi Stéphane,
I'll follow up internally to provide the requested information.
Best regards,
Margie
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 2:08 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Council
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public
Board Meetings
Is someone from Staff able to provide the requested information, whether it be
on the list or during the next Council meeting?
Stéphane
Le 2 mai 2012 à 20:38, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
All,
Given the announcement yesterday of the elimination of the public Board
meetings at ICANN, I would like to put this on the Council agenda as a
discussion item. I would like it if someone from ICANN that is familiar with
the rationale behind this decision could give us an explanation of how and why
that decision was made.
Also, if the ICANN Board can unilaterally declare that all of its meetings will
be private, does this set a precedent for its Supporting Organizations to do
the same thing? I have not reviewed the bylaws with respect to the Council in
a little bit, but does the Council have the discretion to declare that it will
no longer hold a public GNSO Council meeting at ICANN?
I think there has been enough disapproval expressed within the community in the
last day or so that at least merits a discussion of this decision at the
Council level.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|