<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public Board Meetings
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public Board Meetings
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:38:30 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac0oksUf2mjIKu4PQRyawMJrvhahbw==
- Thread-topic: Proposed Agenda Item - Elimination of Friday Public Board Meetings
All,
Given the announcement yesterday of the elimination of the public Board
meetings at ICANN, I would like to put this on the Council agenda as a
discussion item. I would like it if someone from ICANN that is familiar with
the rationale behind this decision could give us an explanation of how and why
that decision was made.
Also, if the ICANN Board can unilaterally declare that all of its meetings will
be private, does this set a precedent for its Supporting Organizations to do
the same thing? I have not reviewed the bylaws with respect to the Council in
a little bit, but does the Council have the discretion to declare that it will
no longer hold a public GNSO Council meeting at ICANN?
I think there has been enough disapproval expressed within the community in the
last day or so that at least merits a discussion of this decision at the
Council level.
Thanks.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|