ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC

  • To: Joy Liddicoat <joy@xxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: AW: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC
  • From: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:55:07 +0100
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-halle.de; s=uhal1dkim; h=To:From:References:Message-id:Date:Subject; bh=zoS00VwcTMVMZqr19j61U8qVdSkYFjWhLmLX4hp3G2s=; b=kffibByLdXN8cc3x/KWKKbLAJeAgRxQWybM3mPHMD0Sn9Vu1AMy0kX4+2hIe11nRFjex7N0vndA897rSwaDyM7M8t8glzALtM/om3uiWqwmEJzWT2MZY/QvJWa4vazQ6oUtj+YJt9fuI3lqJQUnEMgb+zx37aLWesOrYzwgHTTU=;
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <014101ccfef8$31166ec0$93434c40$@apc.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acz+9z3RLH3nhGQNRh69B74Anx9xHAAEErks
  • Thread-topic: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC
For more background see reports about the Geneva Human Rights Council Session:
 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CnrqLUZ4hpEaCD_kxC0-FRTL_f8Hu_cKbxYT9fktj5E/edit?pli=1#
 
http://www.ccianet.org/index.asp?bid=89&BlogEntryID=224&FormID=300&catid=0
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-j-black/uns-itu-could-become-next_b_1332768.html

 
wolfgang
________________________________

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx im Auftrag von Joy Liddicoat
Gesendet: Sa 10.03.2012 20:58
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC



Hi Stephane: 

Just following up on the discussion just now, my suggested question is:

 

What advice can the GAC give the GNSO about the human rights impact assessment 
requirements of the PDP in light of the United Nations Human Rights Councils 
recent HRC Panel on Freedom of Expression and the Internet?

 

I hear your concerns about the need to be focussed and well prepared for the 
GAC meeting and understand the concern that other Councillors may not feel 
well-briefed on this issue - and that GAC members need time to consider issues 
if they are to respond properly. I am open to suggestions about how to raise 
this issue: for example, to table this as question for the GAC to respond to at 
the Prague meeting - so that they have time to consult and prepare a response. 
Or in some other manner if time allows.

 

Kind regards

 

 

Joy Liddicoat

Project Coordinator

Internet Rights are Human Rights

www.apc.org <http://www.apc.org/>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>