<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC
- To: "Joy Liddicoat" <joy@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Question for meeting with the GAC
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:42:46 +0100
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <014101ccfef8$31166ec0$93434c40$@apc.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <014101ccfef8$31166ec0$93434c40$@apc.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Joy. I have added this to the document and will be sending an updated
version.
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT
Le 10 mars 2012 à 20:58, Joy Liddicoat a écrit :
> Hi Stephane:
> Just following up on the discussion just now, my suggested question is:
>
> What advice can the GAC give the GNSO about the human rights impact
> assessment requirements of the PDP in light of the United Nations Human
> Rights Councils recent HRC Panel on Freedom of Expression and the Internet?
>
> I hear your concerns about the need to be focussed and well prepared for the
> GAC meeting and understand the concern that other Councillors may not feel
> well-briefed on this issue – and that GAC members need time to consider
> issues if they are to respond properly. I am open to suggestions about how to
> raise this issue: for example, to table this as question for the GAC to
> respond to at the Prague meeting – so that they have time to consult and
> prepare a response. Or in some other manner if time allows.
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> Joy Liddicoat
> Project Coordinator
> Internet Rights are Human Rights
> www.apc.org
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|