Re: [council] Early draft: questions for our sessions with the Board and the GAC tomorrow

[Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

an input on IANA topic for the Board:

expansion of the IANA topic:

We expect the Board will amend and submit a revised ICANN proposal that 
addresses what NTIA says was lacking in the first proposal.

Question: will the Council need to undertake any policy development to enable 
the revised proposal?    


Why I suggest this:
For instance, will Council need to develop definitions and an evaluation 
process on whether a new gTLD is in the "Global Public Interest"?   

For context something NTIA said:



Based on the input received from stakeholders around the world, NTIA added new 
requirements to the IANA functions’ statement of work, including the need for 
structural separation of policymaking from implementation, a robust companywide 
conflict of interest policy, provisions reflecting heightened respect for local 
country laws, and a series of consultation and reporting requirements to 
increase transparency and accountability to the international community.



Best regards, 

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com

Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.

Sent from my iPad

On 10 Mar 2012, at 13:37, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> Board
> 
> Red Cross and Olympic Committee names: the GNSO is getting mixed messages 
> from the Board and Staff. What exactly is expected of the GNSO in terms of 
> policy development? If we send you a mtion this week, will you act on it?
> 
> Presenter: Alan Greenberg
> 
>  
> 
> WHOIS RT final report recommendation implementation: a discussion of the 
> policy issues here versus the expectations that some may have that these 
> recommendations could be implemented straight away.
> 
> Presenter: Jeff Neuman
> 
>  
> 
> IANA contract: can you provide any further information on this?
> 
> Presenter: Stéphane Van Gelder
> 
>  
> 
> RAA: under what circumstances will the Board request the GNSO initiate a PDP 
> on this topic?
> 
> Presenter: Mary Wong
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> GAC
> 
> What are the GAC member's view on The PDP process includes a specific 
> component to ensure freedom of expression.
> 
> Presenter: Joy Liddicoat
> 
>  
> 
> RAA: Update from registrars. Why does the GAC think pushing for Whois 
> verification will resolve cybercrime, and will you push for the same level of 
> verification for all TLDs worldwide, including ccTLDs?
> 
> Presenter: Mason Cole
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> General suggestion from Jonathan Robinson
> 
> There are issues within each of these topics that we have grappled with and 
> we would like to have a discussion with you on those issues.