<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
Agree on both counts Chuck. My point here is that this is not something that
has come out of the DT. This is a document that Jeff drafted in his own time,
following a request from the GAC to have some supporting documentation.
To me, putting such a document out for public comment would be a step too far
from standard procedure.
Stéphane
Le 29 févr. 2012 à 22:34, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> Moreover, it is not without precedent for WG’s to request comments on their
> work before they are finished.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 4:29 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status
> Report
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification, Stephane - I'd asked precisely because it
> occurred to me that having a formal public comment period for this report
> would not be possible for a number of reasons. That said, and assuming the
> Council will be asked to vote on one/some/all recommendation(s) in Costa
> Rica, I can foresee problems ahead if, for instance, the Council votes then
> to approve certain permanent protections for this and future gTLD rounds
> based on recommendations made by other than a formal GNSO Working Group.
>
> I would think that a few of my Council colleagues would either share my
> concerns or have some of their own. If so, and assuming we agree that should
> this topic come up for a vote in Costa Rica our normal deferral process would
> be the worst thing we could do in terms of responsiveness to the GAC, then we
> need to find ways to get feedback on the actual recommendation(s) from all
> the community, in addition to input on the various options/issues they may
> have already given to the DT during the discussion process.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
> 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone:
> 1-603-513-5143Webpage:http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected
> writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New
> Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed
> and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more
> information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit
> law.unh.edu
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:
> <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 2/29/2012 4:18 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
> There is no official comment period planned for this. This is an unofficial
> report drafted by Jeff to help with an upcoming call, and not a document of
> the DT.
>
> It should therefore not be put out for public comment.
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 29 févr. 2012 à 21:34, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
>
> Thanks Mary. The document is “out for public comment” now. I would love for
> it to be formally out, but some may argue that takes an act of Council. We
> have a very limited time frame here and have had valuable input from each
> constituency and stakeholder group already and continue to get more.
>
> Can ICANN staff put this on their page? Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
>
> From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:25 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>
> Thanks, Jeff and everyone on the DT, for some marvelously quick and detailed
> work, and for a very clear and concise report.
>
> Question - will this be put out for "official" public comment? I ask partly
> because of the possibility that the Council will be asked to vote on at least
> some part of the report in Costa Rica, and also because the recommendations
> pertain to protections that will also apply to future new gTLD rounds.
>
> As many of you know, I definitely support a closer, better and more
> responsive working relationship with the GAC; however, even leaving aside
> issues with the process by which this particular issue came to the table and
> has now to be resolved, I remain concerned about ad-hoc work under the
> heading of "implementation" that isn't so much a natural follow-up to the
> GNSO's own policy recommendations (i.e. in this case the 2007 report on new
> gTLDs) but which could change or conflict with them. I know this issue was
> raised during this particular DT's discussions, as was the issue of
> precedent-setting, so I'm glad we're watchful for these risks. This might,
> however, buttress the argument that at the very least, a public comment be
> instituted prior to any vote/action.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
> 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone:
> 1-603-513-5143Webpage:http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected
> writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New
> Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed
> and now follow the convention:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more
> information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit
> law.unh.edu
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:
> "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 2/28/2012 11:43 PM
> Subject:
> [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
> FYI. Please circulate amongst your constituencies, stakeholder groups and
> Advisory Committees.
>
> From: Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:38 PM
> To: Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx; mark.carvell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> SRadell@xxxxxxxxxxxx;stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx; Neuman, Jeff
> Subject: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>
> Heather, Mark and Suzanne,
>
> As promised, please find enclosed a status report from the Chair of the
> IOC/RC Drafting Team of the GNSO Council that has been tasked with advising
> the GNSO Council with respect to the September 2011 GAC proposal on
> permanently protecting the Olympic and Red Cross names at the top and second
> levels for new gTLDs. Although this report was shared with the members of
> the Drafting Team, it was drafted by me as the Chair, and as such is not an
> official report from the Drafting Team. It represents the Chair’s current
> understanding of the discussions of the Drafting Team. Each of the
> recommendations addressed in this report are still under review by the GNSO
> Community. We are providing this report to assist in the discussions between
> the Drafting Team, interested GNSO Councilors and GAC members on March 2,
> 2012.
>
> Please feel free to forward this report to the other members of the GAC as I
> will be sending this to the GNSO Council as well. We look forward to a
> productive call this Friday as well as in Costa Rica at the ICANN meeting.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete
> the original message.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|