<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
Not sure I understand Mary.
This IS a formal GNSO process. And should the DT come up with recommendations
that the Council approves, I would certainly like to see them put out for
public comment.
Stéphane
Le 29 févr. 2012 à 22:29, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Thanks for the clarification, Stephane - I'd asked precisely because it
> occurred to me that having a formal public comment period for this report
> would not be possible for a number of reasons. That said, and assuming the
> Council will be asked to vote on one/some/all recommendation(s) in Costa
> Rica, I can foresee problems ahead if, for instance, the Council votes then
> to approve certain permanent protections for this and future gTLD rounds
> based on recommendations made by other than a formal GNSO Working Group.
>
> I would think that a few of my Council colleagues would either share my
> concerns or have some of their own. If so, and assuming we agree that should
> this topic come up for a vote in Costa Rica our normal deferral process would
> be the worst thing we could do in terms of responsiveness to the GAC, then we
> need to find ways to get feedback on the actual recommendation(s) from all
> the community, in addition to input on the various options/issues they may
> have already given to the DT during the discussion process.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law
> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
> 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
> http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on the
> Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New
> Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed
> and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more
> information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit
> law.unh.edu
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC:
> <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 2/29/2012 4:18 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>
> There is no official comment period planned for this. This is an unofficial
> report drafted by Jeff to help with an upcoming call, and not a document of
> the DT.
>
> It should therefore not be put out for public comment.
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> Le 29 févr. 2012 à 21:34, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
>
>> Thanks Mary. The document is “out for public comment” now. I would love
>> for it to be formally out, but some may argue that takes an act of Council.
>> We have a very limited time frame here and have had valuable input from each
>> constituency and stakeholder group already and continue to get more.
>>
>> Can ICANN staff put this on their page? Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>>
>> From: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:25 PM
>> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Neuman, Jeff
>> Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff and everyone on the DT, for some marvelously quick and detailed
>> work, and for a very clear and concise report.
>>
>> Question - will this be put out for "official" public comment? I ask partly
>> because of the possibility that the Council will be asked to vote on at
>> least some part of the report in Costa Rica, and also because the
>> recommendations pertain to protections that will also apply to future new
>> gTLD rounds.
>>
>> As many of you know, I definitely support a closer, better and more
>> responsive working relationship with the GAC; however, even leaving aside
>> issues with the process by which this particular issue came to the table and
>> has now to be resolved, I remain concerned about ad-hoc work under the
>> heading of "implementation" that isn't so much a natural follow-up to the
>> GNSO's own policy recommendations (i.e. in this case the 2007 report on new
>> gTLDs) but which could change or conflict with them. I know this issue was
>> raised during this particular DT's discussions, as was the issue of
>> precedent-setting, so I'm glad we're watchful for these risks. This might,
>> however, buttress the argument that at the very least, a public comment be
>> instituted prior to any vote/action.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mary
>>
>>
>> Mary W S Wong
>> Professor of Law
>> Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
>> Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
>> 03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone:
>> 1-603-513-5143Webpage:http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected
>> writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
>> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
>> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the University of New
>> Hampshire School of Law. Please note that all email addresses have changed
>> and now follow the convention:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For more
>> information on the University of New Hampshire School of Law, please visit
>> law.unh.edu
>>
>>
>> >>>
>> From:
>> "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To:
>> "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC:
>> "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date:
>> 2/28/2012 11:43 PM
>> Subject:
>> [council] FW: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>> FYI. Please circulate amongst your constituencies, stakeholder groups and
>> Advisory Committees.
>>
>> From: Neuman, Jeff
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:38 PM
>> To: Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx; mark.carvell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> SRadell@xxxxxxxxxxxx;stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx; Neuman, Jeff
>> Subject: IOC/RC Drafting Team Status Report
>>
>> Heather, Mark and Suzanne,
>>
>> As promised, please find enclosed a status report from the Chair of the
>> IOC/RC Drafting Team of the GNSO Council that has been tasked with advising
>> the GNSO Council with respect to the September 2011 GAC proposal on
>> permanently protecting the Olympic and Red Cross names at the top and second
>> levels for new gTLDs. Although this report was shared with the members of
>> the Drafting Team, it was drafted by me as the Chair, and as such is not an
>> official report from the Drafting Team. It represents the Chair’s current
>> understanding of the discussions of the Drafting Team. Each of the
>> recommendations addressed in this report are still under review by the GNSO
>> Community. We are providing this report to assist in the discussions
>> between the Drafting Team, interested GNSO Councilors and GAC members on
>> March 2, 2012.
>>
>> Please feel free to forward this report to the other members of the GAC as I
>> will be sending this to the GNSO Council as well. We look forward to a
>> productive call this Friday as well as in Costa Rica at the ICANN meeting.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
>> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
>> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
>> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
>> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
>> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|