<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Thoughts on the GAC advice
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Thoughts on the GAC advice
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:57:33 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- In-reply-to: <4EA41BFD.3080000@seltzer.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4EA41BFD.3080000@seltzer.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcyRiwz10U0eSu40S9iDy9is3OOqmgAAITEQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Thoughts on the GAC advice
I think if you preface it by saying "it is the GNSO Council's general opinion"
you are fine (as Kristina's has done with respect to her questions to the
Board).
Adrian Kinderis
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2011 1:52 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Thoughts on the GAC advice
Since Adobe keeps crashing on me, here's what I've been trying to type
into its chat.
We welcome the GAC's participation in the GNSO discussion and Policy
Development Process. We will take comments into account, and we hope
likewise that the GAC will find participating in Council discussions a
helpful alternative to giving Advice to the Board as well as offering a
preview of the Board's potential responses to that Advice.
--Wendy
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|