ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] A question to the candidate

  • To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [council] A question to the candidate
  • From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:16:15 -0700
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen_de_Saint_Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.6.03

I forgot to switch my earlier email to plain text.  Sorry all.



As you think about how you might approach a second term as Chair of the
Council, I wonder if you could give us your thoughts on this:

In the “Discussion Paper on Next Steps to Produce a New Form of the
RAA” sent to the Council yesterday by Kurt Pritz, is this:

"We also note that disagreements in the GNSO Council regarding the
process over the last year have resulted in delays in considering the
substantive issues."

This is not the first time or the softest way in which we have heard
this criticism of delay and disharmony.  How would you move to solve it?



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>