[council] Re: A question to the candidate

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks John. I am unsure whether you expect an answer by email or would prefer 
that we "stockpile" this question for the "Q&A with candidate" session that we 
have planned in Dakar?

I would think that the second option is better, as it means everyone can join 
the discussion as and when they wish.

Also, as I am leaving for Dakar tomorrow and will probably be out of email 
range for a few days, if anyone else has any questions that would mean I could 
address them all at the same time, which might work better.

Would you be OK with this?

Stéphane



Le 14 oct. 2011 à 17:16, <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> I forgot to switch my earlier email to plain text.  Sorry all.
> 
> Berard
> 
> 
> Stephane,
> 
> 
> As you think about how you might approach a second term as Chair of the
> Council, I wonder if you could give us your thoughts on this:
> 
> 
> In the “Discussion Paper on Next Steps to Produce a New Form of the
> RAA” sent to the Council yesterday by Kurt Pritz, is this:
> 
> 
> "We also note that disagreements in the GNSO Council regarding the
> process over the last year have resulted in delays in considering the
> substantive issues."
> 
> 
> This is not the first time or the softest way in which we have heard
> this criticism of delay and disharmony.  How would you move to solve it?
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Berard
>