<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] A question to the candidate
- To: "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] A question to the candidate
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:08:49 -0700
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Glen_de_Saint_Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.6.03
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Stephane,</div><div><span mce_style="font-size: 10pt;"
style="font-size: 10pt;"><br></span></div><div><span mce_style="font-size:
10pt;" style="font-size: 10pt;">As you think about how you might approach a
second term as Chair of the Council, I wonder if you could give us your
thoughts on this:</span></div><div><span mce_style="font-size: 10pt;"
style="font-size: 10pt;"><br></span></div><div><span mce_style="font-size:
10pt;" style="font-size: 10pt;">In the “Discussion Paper on Next Steps to
Produce a New Form of the RAA” sent to the Council yesterday by Kurt
Pritz</span>, is this:</div><div><br></div><div><i>"We also note that
disagreements in the GNSO Council regarding the process over the last year have
resulted in delays in considering the substantive
issues."</i></div><div><br></div><div>This is not the first time or the softest
way in which we have heard this criticism of delay and disharmony. How
would you move to solve it?
</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Berard<br></div></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|