<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: [soac-discussion] Phase II of Public Comments Process Enhancements
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: [soac-discussion] Phase II of Public Comments Process Enhancements
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:08:15 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <61344300-463B-4C47-8749-29A0F98C52AE@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Councillors,
Please see the call for input below.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : Filiz Yilmaz <filiz.yilmaz@xxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : [soac-discussion] Phase II of Public Comments Process Enhancements
> Date : 7 septembre 2011 21:09:53 HAEC
> À : "soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-discussion@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear ICANN Community Leaders,
>
> Phase II of Public Comments Process Enhancements was opened for public
> comments last week on 31 August 2011, as planned.
> This was a milestone in the implementation plans for ATRT recommendations 15,
> 16 and 17.
>
> You can find the full announcement at:
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31aug11-en.htm
>
> the Public Comment box at:
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-enhancements-ii-31aug11-en.htm
>
> and the main report linked from these at:
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comments-process-enhancements-phase-ii-31aug11-en.pdf
>
>
> With this solicitation, we are seeking input from the ICANN Community on the
> following proposed constructs.
>
> 1) Stratification: Categorize topics to assist the community understand the
> subject matter and inform a participation decision.
>
> 2) Prioritization: Assist community members in determining the importance or
> urgency of a solicitation by providing key information.
>
> 3) Comment/Reply Cycles: Structure the community's input process into an
> initial period for submitting new comments followed by a separate reply
> period during which community respondents would be able to address and rebut
> arguments raised in opposing parties' previous comments. The proposed periods
> are minimum 30 days, followed by another 15 days' period.
>
> As an initial test of this concept, at the conclusion of the initial comment
> period (30 September) of "Phase II of Public Comments Process Enhancements",
> and assuming that on-topic submissions have been received, the comment period
> will be extended for an additional 15 days (15 October), introducing a
> "Reply" cycle.
>
> 4) Ideas on Technical Forum Improvements are also incorporated into this
> solicitation. We believe providing a threaded discussion environment as a
> complementary element to ATRT recommendations and to the three constructs
> above might be useful, maximizing transparency and assisting the link in the
> thought process between comments and corresponding replies to them. However,
> switching to a threaded discussion environment is a big change and we want to
> find out whether or not this is how Community wants to interact, via this
> public solicitation. Thinking we may receive good feedback about it, we
> already began development of a prototype Public Comment space utilizing
> ICANN’s Confluence Wiki platform by mid-July. If we receive enough positive
> community interest on the issue, we plan performing a limited community
> testing on such an environment during October-November period.
>
> Thank you again for your support in appointing volunteers for the Focus
> Group, who helped us by providing initial feedback on the subject matters of
> this solicitation. Their valuable feedback is also referred and linked within
> this the solicitation.
>
>
> We hope to hear further comments from your groups on these subjects, during
> the public comment period.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Filiz Yilmaz
> Sr Dir Participation and Engagement
> ICANN
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|