<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Postcards from the EC
Bill,
I agree this is a development we should all be watching with care.
I think it would be a good idea if I put your last question to Heather and
found out if the GAC are up for more interfacing with us. Thoughts?
Stéphane
Le 6 sept. 2011 à 11:51, William Drake a écrit :
> Hi
>
> In the event anyone was puzzled by EC Commissioner de Graaf's pronouncement
> in Singapore that we were all engaged in "a discussion between the deaf and
> the stupid" and has not already seen this, thanks to Kieren we now know what
> hearing and smart looks like.
>
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/08/31/ec-greater-government-control
>
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/9/4/4893009.html
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/print/20110905_icanns_unelected_crisis/
>
> The Commission's six “informal background papers” envision a future in which
> the bylaws change to make GAC advice pretty much mandatory, there are various
> changes to the IANA contract including NTIA's proposal on 'consensus & public
> interest', and governments can easily kill new gTLDs, create a reference list
> of censored terms, and on and on...all to begin being discussed in Dakar.
>
> BTW has there been any further consideration of the ideas floated in SF
> concerning Council/GAC interfacing etc?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> ***************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow
> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
> University of Zurich, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxx
> www.mediachange.ch/people/william-j-drake
> www.williamdrake.org
> ****************************************************
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|