RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

I also think we should talk about what, if anything, we should be doing as a 
Council to ensure that a WG Final Report doesn't get to us and we feel it's 
necessary to send it back to the WG.
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:13 AM
To: Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

This is clearly something we can discuss tomorrow.

As usual, we have not set an official agenda for our wrap-up so that we can 
look forward to some great discussion.

Thanks,

Stéphane



Le 22 juin 2011 à 11:05, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>> 
a écrit :

Unfortunately, that brings us back to the discussion we had after whatever 
meeting it was, when we ended up re-drafting motions during our public meeting, 
and that didn't go down well either - both seem opposite ends of the spectrum 
(too much open discussion versus too little?). Maybe we should discuss this 
during the wrap-up session tomorrow.

Cheers
Mary


Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: 
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From:   "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To:     "'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:'tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>'" 
<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
"'adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:'adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'" 
<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
CC:     "'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date:   6/22/2011 4:59 AM
Subject:        Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
I think both Mikey and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over 
the weekend, which were just that....debates.

To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of stifling 
open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but not if some 
are going to take that out of context.

We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through debate 
and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit of the 
doubt until we took final action.


Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>



From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM
To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"

Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> From: Adrian Kinderis
> Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> To: GNSO Council List
>
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
>
>
>