<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
For the Council's information, I did reach out to Kieren as soon as I saw this
article.
I hope to be able to discuss with him and point out that what the GNSO Council
did today was too approve unanimously a number of consensus policies and give
itself additional time to look at a couple more. But in no way did we attempt
to alter or edit the WG's work.
Stéphane
Le 22 juin 2011 à 10:58, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> I think both Mikey and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over
> the weekend, which were just that....debates.
>
> To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of
> stifling open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but
> not if some are going to take that out of context.
>
> We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through
> debate and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit
> of the doubt until we took final action.
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM
> To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
>
> Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
> report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
> know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
> the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.
>
>
> Tim
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> > From: Adrian Kinderis
> > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> > To: GNSO Council List
> >
> > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
> >
> > Adrian Kinderis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|