<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
- To: <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:01:06 +0200
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F8C02D21@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F8C02D21@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwwsatKbk3S5g0OS+20T9Wbylgc1AACKGzg
- Thread-topic: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
I could follow Mikey's opinion about the council's managerial role. I
wonder whether such a detailed motion was necessary to achieve council
approval. It seemed to me a reflection of the issues having
controversely been discussed in the WG.
This should be an item for discussion at the wrap-up.
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Adrian Kinderis
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2011 09:55
An: GNSO Council List
Betreff: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|