<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
- To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:46:59 -0700
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the
report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all
know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping
the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
> From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am
> To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|