ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

  • To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:20:33 +0200
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C266B@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C266B@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Adrian.

Tim, Jonathan, how say you?

Stéphane



Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :

> Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
>  
> Proposed amendment:
>  
> Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
>  
> Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 
> concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS 
> for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
>  
>  
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
>  
>  
> From: Adrian Kinderis 
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
>  
> All,
>  
> Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to 
> the IRTP-B Motion.
>  
> The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a 
> common position on the complete motion.
>  
> I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s 
> up.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
>  



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>