<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:20:33 +0200
- Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C266B@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB56F87C266B@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Adrian.
Tim, Jonathan, how say you?
Stéphane
Le 21 juin 2011 à 12:17, Adrian Kinderis a écrit :
> Further to my email below I’d like to suggest the following amendment;
>
> Proposed amendment:
>
> Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:
>
> Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3
> concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS
> for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
>
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
>
> From: Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
>
> All,
>
> Much to Glen’s displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to
> the IRTP-B Motion.
>
> The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a
> common position on the complete motion.
>
> I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head’s
> up.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|