ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:17:31 +1000
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acwv9Zv4wcV/+cUtToWXJ0C18FIieQABrELQ
  • Thread-topic: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
Further to my email below I'd like to suggest the following amendment;

Proposed amendment:

Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause:

Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 
concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS 
for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.


Adrian Kinderis



From: Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment

All,

Much to Glen's displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the 
IRTP-B Motion.

The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a 
common position on the complete motion.

I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head's 
up.

Thanks.

Adrian Kinderis
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>