RE: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I understand that it may not be practical to vote on this tomorrow.

However, it is sitting without a second and so I am happy to second it.

Best wishes,

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: 01 June 2011 22:13
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B WG is 
attached in both doc and txt formats.

Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because my 
personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked yet. While 
I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in those two 
recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are policy aspects of 
those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed.
Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or fair to 
either the community or to Staff.

As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not sure the 
WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a result I have left 
them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had time to ocnsider how to frame 
them. 

In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report so 
voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical.
The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion 
purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as 
Singapore.

Thanks,
Tim



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 6172 (20110601) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com