<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 02:19:58 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4DE81843.3090305@gih.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Councillors, FYI.
Stéphane
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
> Date : 3 juin 2011 01:09:55 HAEC
> À : "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Olivier MJ
> Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN
> AtLarge Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : Rép : Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
>
> Dear Katim,
>
> thank you for your patience since my last email. I am happy to say that I
> have now received a reply from Rafik on behalf of the JAS WG. The suggested
> date of Tuesday 7th June would be suitable for the call you suggest below.
> The suggested starting time was, as noted previously, 13:00 UTC.
>
> I'll let Seth Green, At-Large staff, arrange to get the ball rolling. In
> order to maximise usefulness, may I suggest the following:
>
> - the JAS WG should host the meeting
> - The agenda should be set up and adopted jointly before the meeting by the
> groups attending. Note that Board and GAC members planning to attend should
> be asked to submit a list of agenda topics (so prior notice of attendees from
> these groups will be needed). Once the agenda is final, it should be
> distributed beforehand to the JAS mailing list and all expected attendees.
>
> I hope this helps and look forward to this call taking place.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> Le 23/05/2011 03:13, Katim S. Touray a écrit :
>>
>> Dear Olivier and Stéphane,
>>
>> First, let me congratulate you and your teams, as well as the JAS WG on
>> their second report. I've had the opportunity to go through it, and it's
>> quality work.
>>
>> To follow on the second JAS WG report, I would like to ask if you'd be
>> interested in organizing a conference call for interested board members and
>> the GNSO, GAC, and At-Large reps to discuss the status and way forward for
>> the recently released JAS WG report. The idea was presented at the recently
>> concluded board retreat in Istanbul that a public meeting on the JAS WG
>> report (with the participation of the board and GAC) will be helpful, and
>> toward this end, it would be useful to have a conference call. Please let
>> me know if this makes sense to you and let me know when you want to have the
>> call, if indeed you want to have it.
>>
>> Again, thanks to all of you and your teams for the great work you're doing
>> on the issue! I hope we'll all be able to come together to have a useful
>> program we all can be proud of. Have a great week, and best wishes!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Katim
>>
>>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|