ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report

  • To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 02:19:58 +0200
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <4DE81843.3090305@gih.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Councillors, FYI.

Stéphane



Début du message réexpédié :

> De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
> Date : 3 juin 2011 01:09:55 HAEC
> À : "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Olivier MJ 
> Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>, ICANN 
> AtLarge Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : Rép : Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
> 
> Dear Katim,
> 
> thank you for your patience since my last email. I am happy to say that I 
> have now received a reply from Rafik on behalf of the JAS WG. The suggested 
> date of Tuesday 7th June would be suitable for the call you suggest below.
> The suggested starting time was, as noted previously, 13:00 UTC.
> 
> I'll let Seth Green, At-Large staff, arrange to get the ball rolling. In 
> order to maximise usefulness, may I suggest the following:
> 
> - the JAS WG should host the meeting
> - The agenda should be set up and adopted jointly before the meeting by the 
> groups attending. Note that Board and GAC members planning to attend should 
> be asked to submit a list of agenda topics (so prior notice of attendees from 
> these groups will be needed).  Once the agenda is final, it should be 
> distributed beforehand to the JAS mailing list and all expected attendees.
> 
> I hope this helps and look forward to this call taking place.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
> Le 23/05/2011 03:13, Katim S. Touray a écrit :
>> 
>> Dear Olivier and Stéphane,
>> 
>> First, let me congratulate you and your teams, as well as the JAS WG on 
>> their second report.  I've had the opportunity to go through it, and it's 
>> quality work.
>> 
>> To follow on the second JAS WG report, I would like to ask if you'd be 
>> interested in organizing a conference call for interested board members and 
>> the GNSO, GAC, and At-Large reps to discuss the status and way forward for 
>> the recently released JAS WG report. The idea was presented at the recently 
>> concluded board retreat in Istanbul that a public meeting on the JAS WG 
>> report (with the participation of the board and GAC) will be helpful, and 
>> toward this end, it would be useful to have a conference call.  Please let 
>> me know if this makes sense to you and let me know when you want to have the 
>> call, if indeed you want to have it.
>> 
>> Again, thanks to all of you and your teams for the great work you're doing 
>> on the issue!  I hope we'll all be able to come together to have a useful 
>> program we all can be proud of.  Have a great week, and best wishes!
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Katim
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>