ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

  • To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations
  • From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:59:55 +0000
  • Cc: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Importance: Normal
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sensitivity: Normal

No. I Just want to open discussion on it.

Tim

------Original Message------
From: Stéphane Van Gelder
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations
Sent: Jun 2, 2011 1:56 PM

Thanks Tim.

So just to be clear, you are NOT making this motion for our June 9 meeting?

Stéphane



Le 1 juin 2011 à 23:13, Tim Ruiz a écrit :

> A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B
> WG is attached in both doc and txt formats.
> 
> Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because
> my personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked
> yet. While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in
> those two recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are
> policy aspects of those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed.
> Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or
> fair to either the community or to Staff.
> 
> As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not
> sure the WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a
> result I have left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had
> time to ocnsider how to frame them. 
> 
> In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report
> so voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical.
> The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion
> purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as
> Singapore.
> 
> Thanks, 
> Tim
> <Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.doc><Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.txt>






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>