ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report

  • To: "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:56:34 +0200
  • Cc: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=iSqupYmLAC1WX_NiGQ8SYV_tOqg@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BANLkTinRLnWbWFKUorzK0JCQwKjjT0LhRQ@mail.gmail.com> <9D999203-E8A0-4947-B7A4-A89970B50A05@indom.com> <BANLkTi=iSqupYmLAC1WX_NiGQ8SYV_tOqg@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Katim,

Copying the whole Council list once again (which helps me avoid having to send 
2 separate emails ;) ).

We are working on sending the Board a message telling you when we expect the 
report to be considered by the Council. FYI, a motion was made for our last 
meeting and was deferred, so we are set to look at this at our next meeting, on 
June 9. Hope this helps.

Stéphane



Le 23 mai 2011 à 14:54, Katim S. Touray a écrit :

> Hi Stéphane,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your e-mail.
> 
> Your point is noted.  But when does the GNSO Council have a target date for 
> approving the report?  Please realize that a lot of people are awaiting your 
> response to the report, and it would be great if you can respond to the 
> report ASAP.
> 
> By the way, I'm going to be offline until Wedns. (May 25) as I'm going home 
> to my village.  So please bear with me.
> 
> Katim
> 
> 2011/5/23 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hello Katim.
> 
> The call sound premature to me, as the GNSO Council has not approved the 
> report yet.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> Le 23 mai 2011 à 03:13, Katim S. Touray a écrit :
> 
>> Dear Olivier and Stéphane,
>> 
>> First, let me congratulate you and your teams, as well as the JAS WG on 
>> their second report.  I've had the opportunity to go through it, and it's 
>> quality work.
>> 
>> To follow on the second JAS WG report, I would like to ask if you'd be 
>> interested in organizing a conference call for interested board members and 
>> the GNSO, GAC, and At-Large reps to discuss the status and way forward for 
>> the recently released JAS WG report. The idea was presented at the recently 
>> concluded board retreat in Istanbul that a public meeting on the JAS WG 
>> report (with the participation of the board and GAC) will be helpful, and 
>> toward this end, it would be useful to have a conference call.  Please let 
>> me know if this makes sense to you and let me know when you want to have the 
>> call, if indeed you want to have it.
>> 
>> Again, thanks to all of you and your teams for the great work you're doing 
>> on the issue!  I hope we'll all be able to come together to have a useful 
>> program we all can be proud of.  Have a great week, and best wishes!
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Katim
>> 
>> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>