Re: [council] Draft message to the Board

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks John.

Stéphane



Le 10 mai 2011 à 22:41, <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> Stephane,
> 
> I still have trouble with the rush.  We haven't seen it, ALAC hasn't endorsed 
> it, yet the WG feels compelled to send it along.  To what am I blind?
> 
> As to your note, it is OK for me.
> 
> Berard
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Draft message to the Board
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Date: Tue, May 10, 2011 12:44 pm
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> In response to Adrian's suggestion, which so far has met with unanimous 
> support, I have drafted this short email to the Board. Please let me have 
> your thoughts and any suggested edits. Rafik, as JAS WG co-chair and Council 
> liaison, I think it is crucial that we have your input before sending any 
> message to the Board.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Peter,
> 
> On May 10, the Board was sent the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support 
> Working Group ( JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report by ALAC. We understand that 
> this report has not yet been approved by ALAC.
> 
> The GNSO Council wishes to highlight the fact that it has not approved this 
> report yet either. In fact, the Council has only just received it. The report 
> was sent to us by the co-chairs of the JAS working group on May 9, 2011.
> 
> As one of the two chartering organisations of the JAS WG, the GNSO is keen to 
> ensure that the Board understands the nature of the report that it has been 
> sent, and the circumstances under which it received it.
> 
> I would be grateful therefore, if you could convey the GNSO Council's message 
> to the Board.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> GNSO Council Chair