<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Re: Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group matters
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <ocl@xxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Re: Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group matters
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:00:52 +1000
- In-reply-to: <9F422E6A-DCC7-4977-8FA7-176924F55D62@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <4DA83C09.5020003@gih.com> <9F422E6A-DCC7-4977-8FA7-176924F55D62@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acv7dCKWGZpgaiFPRY+Muyi4U3CLmgAAOcxQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Re: Joint Applicant Support (JAS) Working Group matters
Note communications from THE BOARD - as distinct from a Board member - are
generally found in Board resolutions.
I am not aware of a specific Board resolution that would have the effect as
described by Olivier.
The Board of course is very keen to see the output of the working group, but
did not direct a date.
The Board has however articulated its timeline for considering new gTLD matters
at the meeting in San Francisco.
See:
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/draft-timeline-new-gtlds-18mar11-en.pdf
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|