RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: [council] Concerns over JAS Working Group and Violations of its Charter

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

A lot of people put a lot of effort into defining and refining our
policy development process over the years. The concerns I have are that
the CWG does not replace or undermine that. I believe that is what
others have expressed concern about as well. Calling that
micromanagement is out of line and just not true.

Some have bemoaned what they see as unnecessary process. However,
process is what protects this system. Without it, anyone at any time
could question the validity of what is done and there would be no
defense.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: [council] Concerns over JAS
> Working Group and Violations of its Charter
> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, April 13, 2011 1:07 pm
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       
> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> The worries that some on this Council have expressed about the way joint 
> groups work and the risk of seeing them step outside the bounds of the 
> Bottom-up Policy Development Process are clearly real in this context.
> 
> 
> 
> the irony is to talk about Bottom-up PDP which is in the  meantime  hurt by 
> the attempt of micromanagement I am observing from   some in GNSO council .
> 
> Rafik
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>