Re: [council] Re: Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jeff,

I think that you are defending  an incoherent position as you are linking
the action of GNSO council to action of another SO/AC and waiting for it in
contradiction to your defense and advocacy of "GNSO authority"(sic) and then
ending with "an abdication of our responsibilities".
SO waiting for each other  to take actions is a deadlock except if you want
that outcome which  don't think.

Regards

Rafik


2011/4/14 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Thanks Stephane.  FYI, this is why I spent so much time on the Council call
> trying to get the words “forward to the Board” removed from the motion.  As
> I stated during the GNSO Council call last week, one SO to a Cross-SO group
> should never send a report to the Board without hearing from the other SO.
>
>
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman**
> **Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy*
> Please note new address starting March 21, 2011:  21575 Ridgetop Circle,
> Sterling VA 20166
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Stéphane Van Gelder
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:22 PM
> *To:* Lesley Cowley
> *Cc:* Gabriella Schittek; Glen de Saint Géry; Bart Boswinkel;
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> *Subject:* [council] Re: Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)
>
>
>
> Thanks Lesley,
>
>
>
> I am copying the Council on this email in order to pass your message on. Do
> you have any idea of the timeframe for you to get the desired clarification
> from JIG and SSAC?
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 13 avr. 2011 à 12:38, Lesley Cowley a écrit :
>
>
>
> Hi Stéphane,
>
>
>
> I am advised that Patrick Fallstrom has raised some concerns with some of
> the language in the JIG Final Report, as member of the SSAC sub-group.
>
>
>
> In the circumstances, the ccNSO will ask for clarification from JIG and
> SSAC, before it takes any formal position/adopts the final report – would
> you be able to hold off the passing the report to the ICANN Board and staff
> whilst this is sorted please?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Lesley
>
>
>
> *From: *Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:55:22 +0200
> *To: *Lesley Cowley <lesley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc: *Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint
> Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)
>
>
>
> Leslie,
>
>
>
> At its meeting yesterday, the GNSO Council passed the following motion on
> the JIG. As per this motion, I wanted to inform you of the GNSO's approval
> of the JIG's final report, as it pertains to new gTLDs.
>
>
>
> Happy to answer any questions you may have. Please pass this on to the
> ccNSO as you see fit.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Motion on the JIG Final Report on Single Character IDN TLDs
> ===========================================================
>
> WHEREAS,
> The Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) was created by mutual charters
> of the ccNSO (http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jiwg-charter.pdf) and
> the GNSO (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200907);
>
> The JIG identified 3 issues of common interest: 1. Single Character IDN
> TLDs; 2. IDN Variant TLDs; and, 3. Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs;
> The JIG has issued an Initial Report (
> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jig-initial-report-26jul10-en.pdf)
> for public comments (
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-27jul10-en.htm), and
> thereupon a Draft Final Report (
> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jig-draft-final-report-04dec10-en.pdf)
> for public comments (
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04dec10-en.htm), and
> have incorporated the comments into, and has reached consensus on the Final
> Report on Single Character IDN TLDs;
>
> The JIG recommendations are consistent with the GNSO Final Report on the
> Introduction of New Top-Level Domains (
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm),
> including the GNSO IDN WG Final Outcomes Report (
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/idn-wg-fr-22mar07.htm) and the GNSO Reserved
> Names WG (
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/final-report-rn-wg-23may07.htm) on
> the issue of Single Character IDN gTLDs; and,
> The JIG recommendations suggested implementable measures for the acceptance
> of Single Character IDN gTLDs.
>
> RESOLVED,
> The GNSO Council approves the JIG Final Report on Single Character IDN
> TLDs, and forwards the report to the ICANN board and staff for its
> implementation into the next version of the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook as
> it pertains to the new gTLDs.
>
> Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to
> communicate its decision to the ccNSO Chair.
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council hereby expresses its appreciation
> to the JIG for their hardwork, and look forward to receiving further reports
> on "IDN Variant TLDs" and "Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs".
>
>
>