RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't disagree with your thoughts Carlos, but those concerns should
have been focused toward the PPSC Work Team on improving the policy
development process. 

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development
> work and Cross Working Groups
> From: carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, March 09, 2011 9:17 am
> To: <jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Dear Councillors: I fully Agree with jeff on this point and the 
> importance to talk deeply about it, does not mean that I agreed with the
>  document but yes with the subject. In my point of view we need a kind 
> of regulation on this matter to improve the great work of this groups, 
> wich give us the possibilty to get different points of view coming from 
> different positions making reality the bottom up process, the 
> participation and diversity. But, also, I believe that is needed to 
> clarify how it must functioning and how they get their conclusions in 
> order to avoid useless differences.
> 
> 
> 
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:07:44 -0500
> > Subject: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and 
> > Cross Working Groups
> > 
> > 
> > With permission from the Business Constituency, I wanted to point you all 
> > to a document posted on the BC list at 
> > http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/pdf6peymFRFtB.pdf  regarding Cross 
> > SO/AC issues. Without commenting on whether I agree with all of the 
> > substance, I personally believe this document touches on all of the areas 
> > we should be thinking about.  As you know, this subject will be up for 
> > discussion over the weekend with the council and community, and I think 
> > these questions are ones we should all be asking ourselves about CWGs in 
> > the future. I am not sure who is leading that discussion, but this document 
> > could sure help us move this along.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> >  
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> > Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> > 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> > Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> > jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz      
> > 
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
> > use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> > received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> > distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
> > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and 
> > delete the original message.
> > 
> > 
> > 
>                                         
>