ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] RE: REMINDER: Agenda Board meeting with GNSO Council - Sunday March 13, 4pm 5:30 pm

  • To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [council] RE: REMINDER: Agenda Board meeting with GNSO Council - Sunday March 13, 4pm 5:30 pm
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:37:25 -0700
  • Cc:
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

also, can we find out before SF if the actual consultation with GAC is
or is not going to take place there? At the end, it sounded like the GAC
was not on the same page about that. I'm not clear on whether that was
resolved or not.

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] RE: REMINDER: Agenda Board meeting with GNSO Council
> - Sunday March 13, 4pm 5:30 pm
> From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, March 03, 2011 4:22 pm
> To: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>,        Council GNSO
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I would like to add a topic (if others agree) on new TLDs, but specifically 
> the role of the GNSO community in addressing any new items that come out of 
> the GAC/BD discussions on new gTLDs.  More specifically, to the extent that 
> there are any inconsistencies between the policy advice given by the GNSO and 
> what the ICANN Board agrees to with the GAC, how will those matters be 
> handled?
> 
> I did attend the Brussels meeting this week and I am not so concerned about 
> the concessions that were already made (other than some implementation 
> questions I have as a registry), but if some of the "2s" given by the ICANN 
> Board become a "1A or 1B" in the next few weeks, I believe we may have a 
> conflict that needs to be worked out.
> 
> I hope that made sense to people.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 5:12 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] REMINDER: Agenda Board meeting with GNSO Council - Sunday 
> March 13, 4pm 5:30 pm
> 
> 
> REMINDER: These topics should be confirmed no later than by the close of 
> Business tomorrow, 4 March so that they can be transmitted to the Board.
> 
> Thank you
> Kind regards,
> Glen
> 
> 
> Dear Council Members,
> 
> In relation with the meeting with the Board on Sunday afternoon, we should
> send an agenda for this meeting as soon as possible.
> 
> In this sense let me remind you that during the last Council meeting it was
> agreed to propose the topic:
> 
> 
>    - Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation: context of the Board
>    resolution
> 
> 
> Should you have other topics to be included in the agenda, please let Glen
> and myself know as soon as possible.
> 
> Best regards and thanks.
> 
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>