ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Board/GAC meeting In Brussels

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Board/GAC meeting In Brussels
  • From: Ching Chiao <chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:42:22 +0800
  • Cc: "stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A31mU3v0Oc2DNFLmr5QUwJMDLJPFGWwZJ1xM0xzaiA4=; b=riD6NndM2pgLwpXaXqwtSD+I5Ok++ja+SdWdM7LoKjrcaDwOX0pqvGsZbL6h1uJrB0 BhwHYGmY4fpYMvocBtpfxDvS8fhDPq+0MesnbRAsjSZX1edYHq5Z60mP8RtFjYtUncAO 4LKRVZqjtvTqEACv+0J35tcN616K5JsLBLwLk=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=BNZgEqzpVJo3IB80n2LK+EF/ZmmikK9mtI+lZ72SqyoSm05oH/aEpMNzWquGEDNgNN PHe0e28ujtQcH0dEJwQVakJVB5p0VA3xub7Zb8bx92gyA75YtRMU1QZXQWczP5ha5FUc vfhW3fmJ3xKskqqzZJs4zuZXIlTADOL8YZ9b4=
  • In-reply-to: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA706C2102B37@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <5CF204EB-B142-4A8A-BEA5-BD81CDCD205E@indom.com> <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA706C2102B37@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Stephane, Jeff,

I've sent RSVP with hotel and flight info as required, and received a short
note from Kurt's assistance.

Is it required "approval" or a simply a notification process?

Best regards,

Ching


On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Stephane,
>
> I have sent in an rsvp, but as with all others that sent in an rsvp, I am
> awaiting ICANN's approval to attend. I am not sure how they will decide who
> is able to attend, but they said if they had too many rsvps, they would have
> to limit the attendance.
>
> Do you have any more information about that process?
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>  *From*: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 04:37 AM
> *To*: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: [council] Board/GAC meeting In Brussels
>
> Councillors,
>
> In the interest of transparency, please be informed that I will be going to
> the Brussels Board/GAC meeting.
>
> As a reminder, the aim of the meeting is given by ICANN as being to:
>
> 1.Identify the specific differences between Governmental Advisory
> Committee ("GAC") advice and the current implementation of the GNSO New gTLD
> Policy recommendations embodied in the Applicant Guidebook.
>
> 2.Through discussion among Board and GAC members, either:
> a.    arrive at an agreed upon resolution of those differences, or
> b.    for those issues not resolved, identify what differences remain.
>
> Only GAC members, ICANN Board members, select ICANN staff members and
> subject matter experts will participate in the discussion, whether in person
> or remotely.
>
> I will therefore be considered an observer, and will not be allowed to
> speak. I will not be acting as an official representative of the GNSO.
>
> It would be nice to know if other Councillors plan to attend. We may not be
> allowed to speak, but I'm sure we can at least plan to have a drink together
> at some point ;)
>
> Stéphane
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>