RE: [council] Motion and document deadlines added to GNSO calendar

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Personally, I believe no motion should be considered at the meeting
immediately following when it is made. It should almost always wait
until the following one. BUT, if one is going to be considered at the
very next meeting after it is made, the Council should have had at least
14 days to consider and vet it.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Motion and document deadlines added to GNSO
calendar
From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, January 20, 2011 10:59 am
To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Tim,

The GNSO Council meets approximately every 3 weeks. If a 14 day rule is
applied, motions would need to be brought during the one week period
after the last GNSO Council meeting. Would that leave enough time for
dialogue between meetings among councilors and allow for sufficient
consultations with their respective SG/C's?

Margie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 3:26 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Motion and document deadlines added to GNSO
calendar


This is basically 13-14 days. Why not just make it 14 days prior to a
meeting. Then we don't have to worry about changes in the way ICANN
schedules its meetings, and it's simpler to understand.

Would a motion to change that be sufficient, or is more needed?

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] Motion and document deadlines added to GNSO
calendar
From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 8:29 am
To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


I like it. Others?

Stéphane

Le 18 janv. 2011 à 16:00, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> One idea that some have had is to make the motions deadline before an ICANN 
> meeting 8 days prior to the weekend session as opposed to 8 days prior to the 
> Council meeting. This would give ample time to discuss the motions during the 
> weekend and during constituency/stakeholder day. This would make the motions 
> deadline March 4th as opposed to March 8th (if my math is correct).
> 
> Should we try that for this next meeting to test it out and see if that works?
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:44 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Motion and document deadlines added to GNSO 
> calendar
> 
> 
> Councillors,
> 
> FYI, following a suggestion from Jeff on our last Council Leaders' call, we 
> have looked at adding the deadline for submitting motions and documents on 
> our master calendar.
> 
> The idea is, as the meetings tend to roll into each other and it's easy to 
> loose sight of deadlines, to give us better clarity about when motions need 
> to be submitted.
> 
> Glen has implemented this idea and you can see the result on the calendar 
> page (http://gnso.icann.org/calendar#jan): next deadline is shown on Jan 29.
> 
> I hope this is useful to everyone.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> P.S.: There was talk in Cartagena of lengthening motion deadlines before a 
> Public Council meeting. Is there still an interest in looking at this?