<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Council/Chair interaction
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Council/Chair interaction
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:18:12 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <15F9ED1F-B8FD-4BB3-BC95-454DFE9F1401@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acu3/LnImCxijyEvRHKAxgro++mD8QAAA4eQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Council/Chair interaction
make that three . . .
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 12:16 PM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
No, I do understand your concerns, they are clear. I was just trying to bring
extra clarity to why I have proposed this.
Could other Councillors please comment? So far we have two very clear "NOs" and
no other reaction...
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 19 janv. 2011 à 18:12, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
> Those types of things can all be handled easily without a new list. I
> think we understand what you are proposing very well. I don't think
> you fully understand our concerns and perhaps this should be a topic
> for our next Council meeting.
>
> I do not support such a list, but if it happens as an official ICANN
> supported/funded list it should be archived, and archived in near real
> time. In addition, the "leadership" of each SG/C should be certain to
> get clear with its SG/C exactly how or if it will represent them in
> this new list.
>
> Certainly, if the various "leaders" want to get together whether on
> the phone, some other non-ICANN supported/funded list, etc. to discuss
> this or that, they don't need the Council's permission as long it's
> understood that each is acting in their own capacity unless they have
> gotten appropriate direction otherwise.
>
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
> From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 10:57 am
> To: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Adrian, Tim,
>
> Needless to say I am surprised by your reaction to something that
> seems (to me) as innocuous as a mailing list.
>
> Maybe it would be helpful for me to go into more detail about why I
> think this is useful, and provide examples.
>
> One example that comes to my mind is that there could be benefit to
> the Council leadership and C and SG leadership in coordinating
> submissions to the budget requests. For example, one constituency
> might have a good idea about a budget item that they plan to submit as
> a request. Another group might also want to submit the same request,
> if they knew it was being suggested by one group. As a separate
> entity, the Council might also be in that situation. The budget
> request procedure is new this year (we were sent the forms a while
> back by Glen, I have asked for guidance and more information on how to
> use them and will keep the Council informed when I get that). This
> kind of thing might help us manage this kind of process better.
>
> Another possible example might be in planning for public meetings. For
> example, there has been uncertainty about whether the contracted and
> non-contracted party houses should meet (separately) on either
> Saturday or Sunday... Olga can tell us how this is shaping up for the
> SF meeting, but I can tell you from first-hand experience of working
> on planning our meetings with Glen for the past year that this has
> always been difficult to handle.
>
> Another point I would make is that this is consistent with the
> proposal that came out of the OSC's CCT work team (which is now
> closed) which pointed out the need for greater inter SO and AC
> communication and better communication with the Board.
>
> As Councillors, we obviously feel (and rightly feel I think) that it
> is our job to liaise with our respective groups. But I think there
> could be other, non-policy-specific matters where coordination would
> be of benefit and would probably lighten the load on the Council as a
> whole, if the leaders handle that.
>
> I hope this is helpful for you to better understand the way I am
> looking at this and why I think it is useful. Please understand that I
> have no religion on this. I merely proposed this to try and improve
> communications and processes as I have just described. This list can
> be deleted at once if the Council as a whole decides it should be.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 19 janv. 2011 à 17:28, tim@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>
>>
>> Mason has not discussed it with the wider SG, nor even the rest of the ExCom
>> to my knowledge.
>>
>> It is the Councilors' place to have that dialogue with their SG leadership.
>> If there is some kind of disconnect between the Councilors and their SG then
>> that needs to be resolved by them, not by circumventing the structure we
>> have so painstakingly put in place.
>>
>> It takes more than a straw poll to change that structure.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:57:53
>> To: Tim Ruiz<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [council] Council/Chair interaction
>>
>>
>> Thanks Tim.
>>
>> How do others on the Council feel?
>>
>> Tim, Adrian, please note that our Chair Mason Cole has expressed his support
>> for this.
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>> Le 19 janv. 2011 à 14:35, Tim Ruiz a écrit :
>>
>>> Was this discussed with the Council as a whole? Nothing like this
>>> should be done without fromal approval of the Council. For the
>>> record, I do not agree with this and do not believe the "Council
>>> leadership" was put in place to take such actions independently of the rest
>>> of the Council.
>>>
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: [council] Council/Chair interaction
>>>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder
>>>> Date: Tue, January 18, 2011 10:44 am
>>>> To: GNSO Council
>>>>
>>>> Councillors,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to inform you that I have suggested to your group Chairs that a
>>>> mailing list be created to link the C and SG leadership with the Council
>>>> leadership.
>>>>
>>>> Their response was very much in favour, so a mailing list will be set up
>>>> for the Council leaders (Chair and VC) and the group leaders (Chair and
>>>> VC).
>>>>
>>>> The idea is to improve informal communications between the group
>>>> leadership and the Council.
>>>>
>>>> We are also thinking about a regular conf call at some point, but this is
>>>> not set in stone yet.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Stéphane
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|