ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Request for Amendments to the Fast Flux Motion


Thanks Jeff for the second and the proposed amendments.

I accept these as friendly and what to thank Greg for his help in streamlining 
this motion.

Glen, please update the wiki to show the motion, with amendments, and seconded 
by Jeff.

Thanks,

Stéphane 

Le 10 janv. 2011 à 19:04, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :

> All,
>  
> I submit these red-lines to the Fast Flux Motion  with the hope that they be 
> considered friendly amendments.  The credit for these redlines should go to 
> Greg Aaron from Afilias, who chaired the RAP group and just wanted to see 
> some of the language match between the Fast Flux work and the RAP final 
> report.  I recognize the FF motion has not been seconded and I am not sure 
> any amendments can be accepted unless the motion is seconded.  So, if that is 
> necessary, then you can count this as a “second” of the motion.
>  
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>  
> Thanks.
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz     
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
> <FFWG recomendations redline.docx>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>