<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Final Working Group Work Team Report & Motion
Stephane,
I think you have some good points and I completely understand the notion of
having too much to read for what seems like fairly simple concepts. The PPSC
did not discuss this issue and I am not sure to what extent the WG-WT discussed.
However, I believe that once the principles are approved by the Council, that
we (the Council) can direct the staff to draft up a shorter summary (with
encouragement to read the full report). I suppose the PPSC could review the
summary to make sure it is in line with the final report. We could also when
it comes time to approve the principles in our motion direct that staff hold a
short session at the start of every Working Group to educate Working Group
members on the basics for those interested.
Hope that helps.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 10:17 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: Re: [council] Final Working Group Work Team Report & Motion
Hi Jeff,
Because these WG guidelines are intended for use by WG members (see 1.3) I find
it surprising that they would be expected to read a 35 page document in order
to get a grasp on the way ICANN recommends they should set-up and run their WG.
I do not find it realistic to expect volunteer members of a WG, not all of
which would necessarily be very clued on up ICANN processes (nor should we
expect them to be if we are to encourage broader community participation), to
have to tackle such a report. As such, I fear that what we will end up seeing
happening is that people do not read these guidelines and do not profit from
them.
With regards to this, has the idea of producing a one-page summary of the
guidelines been discussed by the PPSC at all? The idea would be to have some
kind of WG guideline "primer" which could help people understand what is
expected of them as part of a GNSO WG.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 2 janv. 2011 à 03:53, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
All,
Please find enclosed the Final Working Group Work Team report as approved by
the Policy Process Steering Committee. I am also attaching for the Council's
review a redline of the report that compares the Final to the Interim Report
that came out prior to the Brussels meeting. The changes reflect public
comments to the Interim report plus changes made as a result of questions
raised by the PPSC as addressed by the Working Group Work Team. All of the
constituencies/Stakeholder Groups represented on the PPSC approved the final
report with the exception of the Business Constituency, who did not vote. The
ALAC representative, who does not officially get a vote, also expressed his
approval of the report.
A non-official informal poll was taken within the PPSC as to whether we should
recommend to the Council that it put the final report out for public comment
before review/approval given the changes that have been made since the last
time the report was out for comment. The Registries, IPC and ISP
representatives believe the GNSO Council should place the report out for
comment; the Registrars did not think it was necessary, but did not object; the
BC did not vote; and the NCSG opposed making this recommendation to the Council
(believing that the Council should decide for itself what it wanted to do).
The motion I present below acknowledges receipt of report and requests that the
report go out for comment (should the council elect to put it out for comment).
I would be happy to answer any questions.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Motion to Acknowledge the Receipt of the GNSO Working Group Guidelines and
Initiate a Public Comment Period
WHEREAS, in October 2008, the GNSO Council established a framework (see GNSO
Council Improvements Implementation Plan;
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-implementation-plan-16oct08.pdf)
for implementing the various GNSO Improvements identified and approved by the
ICANN Board of Directors on 26 June 2008
(http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182
<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm>);
WHEREAS, that framework included the formation, in January 2009, of two
Steering Committees, the Operations Steering Committee (OSC) and thePolicy
Process Steering Committee (PPSC), to charter and coordinate the efforts of
five community work teams in developing specific recommendations to implement
the improvements;
WHEREAS, the PPSC established two work teams, including the Working Group Work
Team (WG WT), which was chartered to develop a new GNSO Working Group Model
that improves inclusiveness, improves effectiveness, and improves efficiency;
WHEREAS, the WG WT completed its deliberations and forwarded the GNSO Working
Group Guidelines to the PPSC on 1 November 2010;
WHEREAS, the PPSC reviewed and approved the GNSO Working Group Guidelines on 20
December 2010 [includelink to GNSO Working Group Guidelines once posted]
and forwarded the report to the GNSO Council on 30 December 2010;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
RESOLVED that the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of the GNSO Working Group
Guidelines as delivered by the PPSC and directs ICANN Staff to commence a
twenty-one (21) day public comment period on the GNSO Working Group Guidelines.
RESOLVED FURTHER that the GNSO Council shall take action on the GNSO Working
Group Guidelines as soon as possible after the end of the public comment period.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 /
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx> /
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
<GNSO WG Guidelines - FINAL - 10 December
2010.pdf><GNSO_WG_Guideline_Revised_Final_Redline_10 December 2010.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|