ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report

  • To: Craig Schwartz <craig.schwartz@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:18 -0500
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07037ABE90@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acnp1l+XC8qQbiI6SA+MpvNpgoWoAEXv3n6gIXp9DuAAHRAoEAAOVbuA
  • Thread-topic: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report

Did I miss the Council resolution declaring the AGP Implementation a success?   
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-19nov10-en.htm



________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:19 AM
To: Craig Schwartz; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report

Thanks Craig for this report.

Councilors:


*         Please note the following statement in this report: "The approved AGP 
Limit Policy provides that ICANN is to report on the implementation of the 
Policy for two years following its effective date of 1 April 2009. Given there 
has been no significant change in the results from the Policy in the last year 
and that the next report would be due several months after the effective date, 
ICANN proposes that this fourth update be the final report to the GNSO Council 
and the community on the implementation of the Policy."  I believe that the 
intent was to say the following:  "The approved AGP Limit Policy provides that 
ICANN is to report on the implementation of the Policy for two years following 
its effective date of 1 April 2009. Given there has been no significant change 
in the results from the Policy in the last year and that the next report would 
be due several months after the end of the two year period, ICANN proposes that 
this fourth update be the final report to the GNSO Council and the community on 
the implementation of the Policy."

*         If there are any objections to this, I suggest that a motion be made 
to extend the reporting period longer.  Otherwise, this would be the last 
report.

Chuck

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Craig Schwartz
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:36 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report

Dear Councilors,

Please find attached the fourth AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report. This 
proposed final report provides a status update on the implementation of the 
Policy since it was announced to the community on 17 December 2008.

ICANN looks forward to providing an update to the Council at one of its future 
meetings and answering any questions councilors may have about this information.

Best,

Craig Schwartz
Chief gTLD Registry Liaison
ICANN


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>