<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
- To: Craig Schwartz <craig.schwartz@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:06:18 -0500
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07037ABE90@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acnp1l+XC8qQbiI6SA+MpvNpgoWoAEXv3n6gIXp9DuAAHRAoEAAOVbuA
- Thread-topic: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
Did I miss the Council resolution declaring the AGP Implementation a success?
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-19nov10-en.htm
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:19 AM
To: Craig Schwartz; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
Thanks Craig for this report.
Councilors:
* Please note the following statement in this report: "The approved AGP
Limit Policy provides that ICANN is to report on the implementation of the
Policy for two years following its effective date of 1 April 2009. Given there
has been no significant change in the results from the Policy in the last year
and that the next report would be due several months after the effective date,
ICANN proposes that this fourth update be the final report to the GNSO Council
and the community on the implementation of the Policy." I believe that the
intent was to say the following: "The approved AGP Limit Policy provides that
ICANN is to report on the implementation of the Policy for two years following
its effective date of 1 April 2009. Given there has been no significant change
in the results from the Policy in the last year and that the next report would
be due several months after the end of the two year period, ICANN proposes that
this fourth update be the final report to the GNSO Council and the community on
the implementation of the Policy."
* If there are any objections to this, I suggest that a motion be made
to extend the reporting period longer. Otherwise, this would be the last
report.
Chuck
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Craig Schwartz
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:36 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
Dear Councilors,
Please find attached the fourth AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report. This
proposed final report provides a status update on the implementation of the
Policy since it was announced to the community on 17 December 2008.
ICANN looks forward to providing an update to the Council at one of its future
meetings and answering any questions councilors may have about this information.
Best,
Craig Schwartz
Chief gTLD Registry Liaison
ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|