RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As Avri pointed out to Rosemary, this is not in the Bylaws but in the
GNSO Improvement recommendations approved by the Board and currently
being implemented in SG and Constituency charters.

 

Chuck

 

From: alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:15 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs
Competition

 

Can you point to where the Bylaws (or anything else) say that?  Alan

At 10/11/2010 08:53 PM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:



Right.
 
So you can be a member of each. Just not a voting member.
 
Adrian Kinderis

 
From: Gomes, Chuck [ mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ] 
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs
Competition
 
I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may
not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.
 
Chuck
 
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs
Competition
 
The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than
one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said
that you could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I
cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter
about multiple memberships??

Alan

At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Wow!
 
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm
 
So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that?
;)
 
 
Adrian Kinderis