ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

  • To: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:47:01 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <BLU0-SMTP705455C5A08A87A9857D6CF4310@phx.gbl>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BLU0-SMTP705455C5A08A87A9857D6CF4310@phx.gbl>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcuA/0T57Xt8zyS2QpWNNs8ufcpT9wAIWXcQ
  • Thread-topic: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition
I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may
not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs
Competition

 

The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than
one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said
that you could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I
cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter
about multiple memberships??

Alan

At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:



Wow!
 
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm
 
So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that?
;)
 
 
Adrian Kinderis
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>