RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nope. I'll just try and wait for someone to stop me.

Adrian Kinderis


From: alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:15 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

Can you point to where the Bylaws (or anything else) say that?  Alan

At 10/11/2010 08:53 PM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

Right.

So you can be a member of each. Just not a voting member.

Adrian Kinderis


From: Gomes, Chuck [ mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs 
Competition

I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may not vote 
in more than one SG or Constituency.

Chuck

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs 
Competition

The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than one 
Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said that you 
could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I cannot find that 
clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter about multiple memberships??

Alan

At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Wow!

http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm

So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)


Adrian Kinderis