RE: [council] ICANN Board briefing materials for the Trondheim meeting - 24/25 September 2010

["Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Bruce.  What are the criteria by which portions of these materials
are redacted, and who makes the decision whether to redact, and how can it
be appealed?  I was appalled to see the 'risk analysis' stricken from the VI
discussion, since obviously that is the most important information/opinion
provided to the Board on that topic (all else was provided by the VI-WG),
and is most deserving of community transparency.

Best,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 8:19 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] ICANN Board briefing materials for the Trondheim meeting
- 24/25 September 2010


Hello All,

The ICANN staff have published some of the briefing materials provided
to the Board for the Trondheim meeting on 24-25 September 2010.

See:

http://www.icann.org/en/minutes

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin