<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC working groups
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC working groups
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:47:44 -0400
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20101029141206.15984.qmail@mm02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20101029141206.15984.qmail@mm02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Act3c0Z3oscY4IdYQPqVIS3nTe49MgABN7lA
- Thread-topic: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC working groups
Totally agree Tim. The plan is to do that first on the list and then in our 18
Nov meeting.
Chuck
From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:12 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC
working groups
Thanks Chuck. I think this is an important topic and should be discussed
in our meetings with the other ACs and SOs. But I think we as a Council
need to discuss to some degree first amongst ourselves and with the GNSO
community. If we have a better understanding of how the GNSO sees the
pros and cons, it would make for more productive meetings when we
discuss cross-AC/SO.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on
> cross-SO/AC working groups
> From: "Gomes, Chuck"
> Date: Thu, October 28, 2010 9:25 pm
> To:
>
>
>
> As I briefly mentioned in our
> meeting earlier today, a possible topic for discussion with the GAC and ccNSO
> in our joint meetings with them in Cartagena is the topic of procedures for
> joint SO/AC working groups or community working groups. As you can see by
> Liz’s email below, I requested that Staff prepare a paper listing some of
> the issues that might need to be considered in that regard. Please review
> this and share any comments you have and provide any opinions you have about
> suggesting this topic to the GAC and ccNSO. If there are any
> objections to suggesting this as a topic for either joint meeting, please let
> me know by Wednesday of next week. If there are none, I will suggest the
> topic to Heather and Chris and send the attached discussion document as well.
>
>
>
> Thanks to Liz and any other
> staff members who helped develop the discussion paper.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Liz Gasster
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 5:23 PM
> To: gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-chairs] draft discussion paper on cross-SO/AC working
> groups
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> On the last chairs call, Chuck suggested that it might be
> useful to encourage discussion between the GNSO Council and the ccNSO and GAC
> (and ALAC…) about the benefits and potential issues associated with
> cross-SO/AC working groups and whether/how their role might be better defined
> in the future. To stimulate that discussion, we prepared the attached
> draft at Chuck’s request.
>
>
>
> The questions are just suggestions, we have not yet engaged
> in any internal consultation, and we do think it will be important to
> consult with the General Counsel’s office to solicit their input and
> guidance.
>
>
>
> Please let us know if this is what you had in mind, and if
> you would like anything further.
>
>
>
> Thanks, Liz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|