<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: charter for JAS WG
Thanks Rafik.
Councilors: It seems to me that this was a simple error that would not have
impacted approval of the charter. If anyone, disagrees, please say so.
Otherwise, I suggest that we approve the corrected charter and make the
correction. If anyone objects to this, please speak up before our meeting on
Wednesday or in that meeting.
Glen – Please add this as item 9.2 with applicable links and the added item 5
(i.e., Rafik’s message): Charter Correction for JAS WG (SO/AC gTLD Applicant
Support) .
Chuck
From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 10:44 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: charter for JAS WG
Hello Chuck,
I am sending this email acting as GNSO liaison for JAS WG (SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support ) and requesting to fix an issue with the WG charter.
It seems that the GNSO council voted for the motion "20100520-3" which includes
links redirected to version of WG charter containing only 4 objectives (in GNSO
page http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-jas-wg-charter-12may10-en.htm) when the
correct version of the charter contains 5 objectives (here in the WG wiki
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi?so_ac_new_gtld_applicant_support_working_group)
The missing objective is the number 5 which you can find in the wiki page:
"To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the risk of
inappropriate access to support"
Best Regards
Rafik
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|