ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] charter for JAS WG

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] charter for JAS WG
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:44:01 +0900
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=LSzbuV9agYKsSX8mwULkaLEq/6ZAHz9uBQw4+XGlgW4=; b=VArr0IL53SZL6KWFp5PkI87ZDT0S8315be9pkA4RCfAFmu2cicts3+4/k03xPQNEJq ov7Zi4DEP8f6+eBGcXuI8lmq3AbWXbYG1nuZzCrKGfwdr3mOBYepqhxFIz8xJ5yOSVhF Zx/foUPF2YonT9naRoSrqdy01RRBfiYdcLIeU=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=REYb4MwvnI2EtBwPZSpOhC2UP6IK53IbQRJgHP6iLZUybHcKqcGRaTbwZUkEe8r7N0 6sVmTFvzLAzrzhy6FjppHNZ3eqe5GcGwD8Npa8UkIVxhJ/C9DQcHg6I4RRhhLedAShCE bc7D4Mb15px0Qb8fLrCBelQuxyv1h30hnQS/E=
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello Chuck,

I am sending this email acting as GNSO liaison for JAS WG (SO/AC New gTLD
Applicant Support ) and  requesting to fix an issue with the WG charter.

It seems that the GNSO council voted for the motion "20100520-3" which
includes links redirected to version of WG charter containing only 4
objectives (in GNSO page
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-jas-wg-charter-12may10-en.htm) when the
correct version of the charter contains 5 objectives (here in the WG wiki
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi?so_ac_new_gtld_applicant_support_working_group
)

The missing objective is the number 5 which you can find in the wiki page:
"To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the risk of
inappropriate access to support"

Best Regards

Rafik
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>