ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: Board briefing papers available for Brussels Meeting

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: Board briefing papers available for Brussels Meeting
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:21:20 +1000
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F59A88061@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <B7ACC01E42881F4981F66BA96FC1495704DCDE31@WIC001MITEBCLV1.messaging.mit> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F59A88061@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: ActChtgDhzYJSMCvScCBw51VbMr7HQAGio+wACAOcEA=
  • Thread-topic: Board briefing papers available for Brussels Meeting

Hello Adrian,

> 
> Why were the IDN ccTLD delegation requests redacted?

I think the simple answer is that these were staff evaluations that
pointed out some deficiencies in some of the proposals.  They were not
originally written for publication, and the staff are probably concerned
about creating offence.  The degree to which reports should be redacted
is being considered by the Board's Governance Committee. 


You can view the formal delegation reports at:

http://www.iana.org/reports

e.g the recent report for China is available at:

http://www.iana.org/reports/2010/zhongguo-report-07jun2010.html

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>